Are you incapable of dealing with a paragraph or two of text?
- Despite the claims of Greasy Joe, it appears he was actually in possession of classified and highly classified material, some of which was listed as top secret
- He was never in a political position where he was authorised to even view such material - much less take possession of it
- Also, despite his claims, it was not all secured in lock-up cabinets, as even the highest levels of intellectual dishonesty CNN has to offer, would struggle to list Joe's garage floor as a lock-up cabinet (there are photos).
When you look at it like that, paragraph one was nothing but a series of bullet points. What aspect are you struggling with?
- Greasy Joe was fully aware he had this stuff - he'd possessed it for years - it was not volunteered for surrender in all that time
The rest of paragraph 2 is admittedly narrative.
No, I'm not raking through history to 'provide links'. If you can't directly dispute a point, then question your own links.